COMPARE · Reviewed August 3, 2026
OKTA vs TENB
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. OKTA scored 55.1, TENB scored 64.7 — TENB leads.
Compare another set
OKTA
Okta, Inc.
55.1
$141.57 · $24.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
9.6
TENB leads
TENB
Tenable Holdings, Inc.
64.7
$34.97 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
OKTA
stronger →← stronger
TENB
48
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
50
86
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
81
40
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
67
TENB is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
OKTA
TENB
$911mC+
FCF
$259mC
+11.7%B
Rev
+10.7%B
0.06A-
D/E
2.11D
102.6xD
P/E
—
1.35B
PEG
0.99B+
—
P/S
3.8xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
OKTA
TENB
24% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
18% below
~13%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~2%/yr
-28%
1-yr DCF upside
+11%
-19%
5-yr DCF upside
+22%
-5%
10-yr DCF upside
+39%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
OKTA
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
TENB
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
OKTAOkta, Inc.
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $24.6b. 10% off the 52-week high of $157.00. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 42 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $129.02 (implying -9% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong. Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
Trailing P/E 102.6x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. ROE 4% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate. AI-native re-pricing — GPT-class models are compressing the cost of features that took years to build; the moat thesis depends on owning the workflow, not just the feature set.
TENBTenable Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $3.9b. 20% off the 52-week high of $43.67. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.99 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $35.35 (implying +1% upside).
Moat
Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
D/E 2.11 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Currently unprofitable (margin -1.2%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.