COMPARE · Reviewed August 3, 2026
OKTA vs RBRK
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. OKTA scored 55.1, RBRK scored 56.0 — RBRK leads.
Compare another set
OKTA
Okta, Inc.
55.1
$141.57 · $24.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.9
RBRK leads
RBRK
Rubrik, Inc.
56
$74.74 · $15.4B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
OKTA
stronger →← stronger
RBRK
48
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
50
86
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
100
40
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
35
RBRK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
OKTA
RBRK
$911mC+
FCF
$294mC
+11.7%B
Rev
+45.7%A
0.06A-
D/E
—
102.6xD
P/E
—
1.35B
PEG
—
—
P/S
10.8xC
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
OKTA
RBRK
24% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
153% above
~13%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~40%/yr
-28%
1-yr DCF upside
-70%
-19%
5-yr DCF upside
-61%
-5%
10-yr DCF upside
-42%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
OKTA
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
RBRK
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Short track record
The companies
OKTAOkta, Inc.
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $24.6b. 10% off the 52-week high of $157.00. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 42 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $129.02 (implying -9% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong. Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
Trailing P/E 102.6x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. ROE 4% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate. AI-native re-pricing — GPT-class models are compressing the cost of features that took years to build; the moat thesis depends on owning the workflow, not just the feature set.
RBRKRubrik, Inc.
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $15.4b. Down 25% from 52-week high of $99.75 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +46% — in hypergrowth territory. 26 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $95.23 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong. Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
P/S 10.8x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard. Net margin 4.2% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE -12% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.