Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. OGS scored 67.7, SBS scored 46.3 — OGS leads.
Compare another set
OGS
ONE Gas, Inc.
Utilities - Regulated Gas · Quality-Growth
67.7
$72.50 · $4.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
21.4
OGS leads
SBS
Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP
Utilities - Regulated Water · Quality-Growth
46.3
$6.74 · $23.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestOGS1.8x
Fastest growthOGS+42.5%
Strongest balance sheetOGS0.96
Highest qualitySBS62 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/S multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
OGS
stronger →← stronger
SBS
46
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
62
80
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
60
84
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
36
OGS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
OGS
SBS
-$173mF
FCF
-$1.6bF
+42.5%A
Rev
+5.4%C+
0.96A-
D/E
1.14B+
1.8xB+
P/S
2.9xB
6.16D
PEG
0.47A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
OGS
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
SBS
Why this score
Raising its dividend
Diluting shareholders
Foreign reporter (BRL)
The companies
OGSONE Gas, Inc.
Utilities - Regulated Gas · $72.50 · beta 0.63
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Gas · market cap $4.6b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $90.78 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +43% — in hypergrowth territory. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $86.17 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$173m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
SBSCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP
Utilities - Regulated Water · $6.74 · beta 0.08
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Water · market cap $23.7b. 6% off the 52-week high of $7.16. PEG 0.47 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 5 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $6.74 (implying -0% upside).
Moat
Net margin 20% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 19% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$1.6b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
OGS leads SBS by 0.6 points (63.9 to 63.3), its sharpest advantage coming in D/E (grade A-). A contrarian could still prefer SBS for its stronger PEG (grade A). All screen as spec-type names but sit in different sectors (Utilities - Regulated Gas versus Utilities - Regulated Water), so their grades are relative to different peer sets.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where OGS and SBS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 21.4 points in favor of OGS. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueOGS 84.3 · SBS 36.4OGS +47.9
GrowthOGS 80.4 · SBS 60.3OGS +20.1
QualityOGS 45.7 · SBS 62.0SBS +16.3
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is OGS or SBS the better stock?
OGS scores higher: OGS 67.7, SBS 46.3 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do OGS and SBS differ most?
The widest gap is value, where OGS leads by 48 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are OGS and SBS scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.