COMPARE · Reviewed July 2, 2026
OGC vs ORLA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. OGC scored 72, ORLA scored 69 — OGC ahead by 3.
OGC
OceanaGold Corporation
72
$26.10
Score gap
3
OGC leads
ORLA
Orla Mining Ltd.
69
$10.18
The companies
OGCOceanaGold Corporation
Why now
Gold · market cap $5.8b. Down 40% from 52-week high of $43.33 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +46% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.17 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 34% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 35% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Mining moat is reserve quality + extraction cost per unit — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the commodity cycle while marginal producers burn it.
Risk
Down 40% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.47 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
ORLAOrla Mining Ltd.
Why now
Gold · market cap $3.8b. Down 54% from 52-week high of $21.98 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +208% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.07 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 42% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 142% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 54% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Base grades (each contributes ~14.3% of base composite)
| OGC | Component | ORLA |
|---|---|---|
| C+70 | FCF | C65 |
| A95 | Rev | A95 |
| A95 | D/E | B80 |
| A95 | P/E or P/S | B+85 |
| A95 | PEG | A95 |
| Supplemental signals · feed the score, not on the row card | ||
| A95 | FCF Yield | A-90 |
| A95 | ROE | A95 |
| 91.8 | Base composite | 86.8 |
Adjustments (signed deltas applied on top of base)
OGC
compounder synergy (FCF yield ≥5% + ROE ≥15% + D/E <1)+4
GARP sweet spot (PEG <1, positive FCF)+1
DCF cross-check (avg upside 120%)+2
Total+7
ORLA
GARP sweet spot (PEG <1, positive FCF)+1
analyst consensus bullish (89% buy/strong-buy)+2
Total+3
DCF cross-check (per-share value vs. live price)
| OGC upside | Horizon | ORLA upside |
|---|---|---|
| +57% | 1Y | +22% |
| +105% | 5Y | +17% |
| +197% | 10Y | +10% |
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.