Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. NWG scored 77.0, BSAC scored 75.0 — NWG leads.
Compare another set
NWG
NatWest Group plc
Banks - Regional · Financial strength
78.1Fin
$17.54 · $69.4B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
6.0
BSAC leads
BSAC
Banco Santander-Chile
Banks - Regional · Financial strength
84.1Fin
$32.18 · $15.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestNWG8.8x
Fastest growthBSAC+20.2%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
NWG
BSAC
+13.3%B+
Rev
+20.2%A-
8.8xA-
P/E
12.4xB
14.8%B
ROE
23.6%A-
1.34B+
P/B
1.32B+
5.5%A-
Yield
4.6%B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
NWGNatWest Group plc
Banks - Regional · $17.54 · beta 0.82
Why now
Banks - Regional · market cap $69.4b. 10% off the 52-week high of $19.42. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $21.91 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
Net margin 38% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. $69.4b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
BSACBanco Santander-Chile
Banks - Regional · $32.18 · beta 0.23
Why now
Banks - Regional · market cap $15.2b. 15% off the 52-week high of $37.72. Revenue growing +20%, comfortably above the S&P median. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $34.95 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
Net margin 47% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 24% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Credit-cycle exposure — provisions tend to lag actual loan deterioration by 2-3 quarters; a sharp uptick in net charge-offs is a leading indicator the market often misses until it's already priced.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is NWG or BSAC the better stock?
NWG scores higher: NWG 77.0, BSAC 75.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are NWG and BSAC scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.