COMPARE · Data as of October 9, 2026

NVR vs IBP

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. NVR scored 38.6, IBP scored 42.9 — IBP leads.
Compare another set
NVR
NVR, Inc.
Residential Construction · Quality-Growth
38.6
$5,899.16 · $15.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.3
IBP leads
IBP
Installed Building Products, Inc.
Residential Construction · Quality-Growth
42.9
$185.44 · $4.9B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestNVR15.3x
  • Fastest growthIBP+1.0%
  • Strongest balance sheetNVR0.32
  • Highest qualityNVR83 / 100
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD38.6/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY83.2GROWTH18.4VALUE37.6
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD42.9/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY76.9GROWTH29.7VALUE34.5
NVRIBPQuality83.276.9Growth18.429.7Value37.634.5
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-20%11%10x25xNVRIBP

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFNVR$1.0bIBP$292m
RevNVR-9.9%IBP+1.0%
D/ENVR0.32IBP1.87
P/ENVR15.3xIBP20.0x
NVR
stronger →← stronger
IBP
83
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
77
18
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
30
38
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
34
NVR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
NVR
IBP
$1.0bC+
FCF
$292mC
-9.9%D
Rev
+1.0%C
0.32A-
D/E
1.87C+
15.3xB+
P/E
20.0xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
NVR
IBP
15% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
90% above
~2%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~19%/yr
-3%
1-yr DCF upside
-45%
-13%
5-yr DCF upside
-47%
-26%
10-yr DCF upside
-50%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
NVR
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
IBP
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Raising its dividend
  • Durable high returns
NVRNVR, Inc.
Residential Construction · $5,899.16 · beta 0.90
Why now
Residential Construction · market cap $15.8b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $8200.00 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -10% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $6,395 (implying +8% upside).
Moat
ROE 34% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Revenue contracting -10% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line.
IBPInstalled Building Products, Inc.
Residential Construction · $185.44 · beta 1.72
Why now
Residential Construction · market cap $4.9b. Down 47% from 52-week high of $349.00 — deep drawdown territory. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $230.08 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
ROE 38% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 116% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Down 47% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.72 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where NVR and IBP diverge

On the headline score the gap is 4.3 points in favor of IBP. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.

Common questions

Is IBP or NVR the better stock?

IBP scores higher: IBP 42.9, NVR 38.6 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

Where do IBP and NVR differ most?

The widest gap is growth, where IBP leads by 11 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.

How are IBP and NVR scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.