COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
NVDA vs TER
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. NVDA scored 85.9, TER scored 64.1 — NVDA leads.
Compare another set
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
85.9
$214.72 · $5.2T
fundamentals as of
Score gap
21.8
NVDA leads
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
64.1
$375.74 · $58.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestNVDA32.9x
- Fastest growthNVDA+70.7%
- Strongest balance sheetTER0.03
- Highest qualityTER90 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
NVDA
stronger →← stronger
TER
88
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
90
99
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
79
73
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
37
NVDA is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
NVDA
TER
$119.1bA
FCF
$800mC+
+70.7%A
Rev
+57.9%A
0.07B+
D/E
0.03A-
32.9xB
P/E
51.5xC+
0.60A-
PEG
0.97B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
NVDA
TER
224% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
415% above
~50%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
>60%/yr
-76%
1-yr DCF upside
-85%
-69%
5-yr DCF upside
-81%
-56%
10-yr DCF upside
-72%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
NVDA
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
TER
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
NVDANVIDIA Corporation
Why now
Semiconductors · market cap $5.2T. 9% off the 52-week high of $236.54. Revenue growing +71% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.60 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 58 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $304.12 (implying +42% upside).
Moat
Net margin 63% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 82% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $5.2T market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Beta 2.21 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. P/S 20.5x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
TERTeradyne, Inc.
Why now
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials · market cap $58.7b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $487.91 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +58% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.97 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $449.80 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 26% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $58.7b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Trailing P/E 51.5x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Beta 1.79 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. P/S 13.2x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where NVDA and TER diverge
On the headline score the gap is 21.8 points in favor of NVDA. The widest single difference is Value, where NVDA leads by 35.5 points.
- ValueNVDA 72.6 · TER 37.1NVDA +35.5
- GrowthNVDA 99.5 · TER 78.6NVDA +20.9
- QualityNVDA 87.8 · TER 90.2level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.