COMPARE · Reviewed July 2, 2026

NVDA vs PCTY

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. NVDA scored 86.4, PCTY scored 88.5 — PCTY ahead by 2.0999999999999943.
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
Semiconductors · Quality-Growth
86.4
$194.83
Score gap
2.0999999999999943
PCTY leads
PCTY
Paylocity Holding Corporation
Software - Application · Quality-Growth
88.5
$115.10
NVDANVIDIA Corporation
Semiconductors · $194.83 · beta 2.20
Why now
Semiconductors · market cap $4.7T. 18% off the 52-week high of $236.54. Revenue growing +65% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.61 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 58 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $301.62 (implying +55% upside).
Moat
Net margin 63% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 82% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $4.7T market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Beta 2.20 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. P/S 18.6x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard. Semiconductor cyclicality — inventory corrections compress margins faster than analysts model. Monitor channel inventory and book-to-bill ratios as leading indicators.
PCTYPaylocity Holding Corporation
Software - Application · $115.10 · beta 0.51
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $6.2b. Down 42% from 52-week high of $197.78 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.88 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $152.42 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 189% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 42% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. AI-native re-pricing — GPT-class models are compressing the cost of features that took years to build; the moat thesis depends on owning the workflow, not just the feature set.
NVDAComponentPCTY
A95FCFC65
A95RevB+85
A-90D/EB+85
B80P/E or P/SB+85
A-90PEGB+85
Supplemental signals · feed the score, not on the row card
C+70FCF YieldA-90
A95ROEA-90
87Base composite83.9
NVDA
GARP sweet spot (PEG <1, positive FCF)+1
analyst consensus bullish (95% buy/strong-buy)+2
insider cluster buying (net +6.4%, 40 txns)+2
forward P/E cheaper (30 → 15)+1
mild accruals (OCF/NI 0.79)-1
DCF cross-check (avg upside -64%)-2
ROE truncated (buyback-depleted equity)-1
Total+2
PCTY
compounder synergy (FCF yield ≥5% + ROE ≥15% + D/E <1)+4
GARP sweet spot (PEG <1, positive FCF)+1
analyst consensus bullish (90% buy/strong-buy)+2
forward P/E cheaper (25 → 13)+1
DCF cross-check (avg upside 114%)+2
stacked-bonus cap (+10 → 9.8)-0.15153137095996172
Total+9.848468629040038
NVDA upsideHorizonPCTY upside
-74%1Y+99%
-66%5Y+111%
-52%10Y+131%
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.