COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026
HLNE vs NTRS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. HLNE scored 78.0, NTRS scored 66.0 — HLNE leads.
Compare another set
HLNE
Hamilton Lane Incorporated
79.6Fin
$106.04 · $5.9B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
8.9
HLNE leads
NTRS
Northern Trust Corporation
70.7Fin
$186.79 · $34.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestNTRS16.0x
- Fastest growthHLNE+6.5%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
HLNE
NTRS
+6.5%C+
Rev
-2.5%D+
16.1xC+
P/E
16.0xC+
32.4%A
ROE
17.1%B+
4.84D
P/B
2.73C+
2.2%B
Yield
1.8%C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
HLNEHamilton Lane Incorporated
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $5.9b. Down 32% from 52-week high of $155.66 — deep drawdown territory. 7 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $133.57 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Net margin 32% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 32% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 32% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
NTRSNorthern Trust Corporation
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $34.2b. 5% off the 52-week high of $195.78. 13 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $184.27 (implying -1% upside).
Moat
Net margin 25% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.