Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. NTB scored 80.0, WFC scored 75.0 — NTB leads.
Compare another set
NTB
The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited
Banks - Diversified · Financial strength
74.3Fin
$57.50 · $2.3B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
10.6
NTB leads
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
Banks - Diversified · Financial strength
63.7Fin
$83.55 · $252.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestNTB10.1x
Fastest growthNTB+4.3%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
NTB
WFC
+4.3%C+
Rev
+1.7%C
10.1xA-
P/E
11.9xB
21.1%A-
ROE
12.6%B
1.97B
P/B
1.53B
3.5%B
Yield
2.4%B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
NTBThe Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited
Banks - Diversified · $57.50 · beta 0.54
Why now
Banks - Diversified · market cap $2.3b. 10% off the 52-week high of $64.17. PEG 0.56 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $66.00 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
Net margin 37% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 21% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Regulatory capital risk — stricter capital requirements (CCAR, Basel) can force a dividend cut or a capital raise; the largest banks are most exposed because they're held to the tightest standards.
WFCWells Fargo & Company
Banks - Diversified · $83.55 · beta 0.95
Why now
Banks - Diversified · market cap $252.7b. 15% off the 52-week high of $97.76. 24 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $99.02 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Net margin 27% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. $252.7b market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is NTB or WFC the better stock?
NTB scores higher: NTB 80.0, WFC 75.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are NTB and WFC scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.