COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
HSY vs NOMD
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. HSY scored 65.9, NOMD scored 45.4 — HSY leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. HSY's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but NOMD's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
HSY
The Hershey Company
65.9
$186.46 · $37.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
20.5
HSY leads
NOMD
Nomad Foods Limited
45.4
$11.54 · $1.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestNOMD11.4x
- Fastest growthHSY+7.7%
- Strongest balance sheetNOMD0.92
- Highest qualityHSY82 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueNOMD-71%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
HSY
stronger →← stronger
NOMD
82
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
56
76
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
44
46
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
44
HSY is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
HSY
NOMD
$2.2bB
FCF
$275mC
+7.7%B
Rev
-2.2%D+
1.30C+
D/E
0.92B
25.4xC+
P/E
11.4xA
1.07B+
PEG
2.79C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
HSY
NOMD
14% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
71% below
~6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-24%/yr
-1%
1-yr DCF upside
+241%
+17%
5-yr DCF upside
+246%
+49%
10-yr DCF upside
+253%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
HSY
No notable signals flagged.
NOMD
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Foreign reporter (EUR)
The companies
HSYThe Hershey Company
Why now
Confectioners · market cap $37.5b. Down 22% from 52-week high of $239.48 — deep drawdown territory. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $205.81 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 150% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
NOMDNomad Foods Limited
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $1.6b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $15.91 — deep drawdown territory. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $13.64 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 191% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 4.5% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where HSY and NOMD diverge
On the headline score the gap is 20.5 points in favor of HSY. The widest single difference is Growth, where HSY leads by 31.4 points.
- GrowthHSY 75.9 · NOMD 44.5HSY +31.4
- QualityHSY 81.7 · NOMD 55.7HSY +26.0
- ValueHSY 46.1 · NOMD 44.1level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.