COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
BRBR vs NOMD
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BRBR scored 72.0, NOMD scored 45.4 — BRBR leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. BRBR's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but NOMD's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BRBR
BellRing Brands, Inc.
72
$10.19 · $1.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
26.6
BRBR leads
NOMD
Nomad Foods Limited
45.4
$11.54 · $1.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestBRBR7.2x
- Fastest growthBRBR+16.1%
- Highest qualityBRBR62 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueBRBR-86%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BRBR
stronger →← stronger
NOMD
62
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
56
62
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
44
98
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
44
BRBR is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BRBR
NOMD
$225mC
FCF
$275mC
+16.1%B+
Rev
-2.2%D+
—
D/E
0.92B
7.2xA
P/E
11.4xA
0.28A
PEG
2.79C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BRBR
NOMD
86% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
71% below
decline
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-24%/yr
+446%
1-yr DCF upside
+241%
+626%
5-yr DCF upside
+246%
+1023%
10-yr DCF upside
+253%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BRBR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Short track record
NOMD
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Foreign reporter (EUR)
The companies
BRBRBellRing Brands, Inc.
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $1.2b. Down 76% from 52-week high of $43.02 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.28 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $14.71 (implying +44% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 131% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 76% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. ROE -37% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
NOMDNomad Foods Limited
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $1.6b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $15.91 — deep drawdown territory. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $13.64 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 191% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 4.5% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BRBR and NOMD diverge
On the headline score the gap is 26.6 points in favor of BRBR. The widest single difference is Value, where BRBR leads by 54.3 points.
- ValueBRBR 98.4 · NOMD 44.1BRBR +54.3
- GrowthBRBR 62.1 · NOMD 44.5BRBR +17.6
- QualityBRBR 62.1 · NOMD 55.7BRBR +6.4
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.