Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. NMR scored 69.0, PJT scored 76.0 — PJT leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. PJT's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but NMR's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
NMR
Nomura Holdings, Inc.
Capital Markets · Financial strength
68.9Fin
$9.59 · $28.0B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
10.5
NMR leads
PJT
PJT Partners Inc.
Capital Markets · Financial strength
58.4Fin
$137.28 · $5.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestNMR11.2x
Fastest growthPJT+14.8%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
NMR
PJT
+10.8%B
Rev
+14.8%B+
11.2xB+
P/E
18.8xC
11.2%B
ROE
37.6%A
1.15B+
P/B
11.26D
3.4%B
Yield
0.7%C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
NMRNomura Holdings, Inc.
Capital Markets · $9.59 · beta 0.64
Why now
Capital Markets · market cap $28.0b. 12% off the 52-week high of $10.94. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.81 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 17% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
D/E 9.46 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
PJTPJT Partners Inc.
Capital Markets · $137.28 · beta 0.88
Why now
Capital Markets · market cap $5.8b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $195.62 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $160.71 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
ROE 38% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Regulatory capital risk — stricter capital requirements (CCAR, Basel) can force a dividend cut or a capital raise; the largest banks are most exposed because they're held to the tightest standards.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is PJT or NMR the better stock?
PJT scores higher: PJT 76.0, NMR 69.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are PJT and NMR scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.