COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

NJR vs POR

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. NJR scored 63.2, POR scored 51.9 — NJR leads.
Compare another set
NJR
New Jersey Resources Corporation
Utilities - Regulated Gas · Quality-Growth
63.2
$53.52 · $5.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
11.3
NJR leads
POR
Portland General Electric Company
Utilities - Regulated Electric · Quality-Growth
51.9
$49.59 · $5.8B
fundamentals as of
  • Fastest growthNJR+7.0%
  • Strongest balance sheetPOR1.36
  • Highest qualityNJR77 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueNJR-26%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD63.2/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY76.6GROWTH48.4VALUE68.0
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD51.9/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY39.1GROWTH52.4VALUE68.3
NJRPORQuality76.639.1Growth48.452.4Value68.068.3
FCFNJR$359mPOR-$189m
RevNJR+7.0%POR+1.3%
D/ENJR1.47POR1.36
PEGNJR2.13POR1.81
NJR
stronger →← stronger
POR
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
39
48
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
52
68
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
68
NJR and POR split the three pillars evenly.
NJR
POR
$359mC
FCF
-$189mF
+7.0%C+
Rev
+1.3%C
1.47B
D/E
1.36B
14.8xA-
P/E
2.13C
PEG
1.81C+
P/S
1.7xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
NJR
POR
26% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
~-7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
+46%
1-yr DCF upside
+35%
5-yr DCF upside
+20%
10-yr DCF upside
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
NJR
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
POR
Why this score
  • Diluting shareholders
NJRNew Jersey Resources Corporation
Utilities - Regulated Gas · $53.52 · beta 0.53
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Gas · market cap $5.4b. 12% off the 52-week high of $60.86. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $60.00 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Net margin 24% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
PORPortland General Electric Company
Utilities - Regulated Electric · $49.59 · beta 0.53
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $5.8b. 9% off the 52-week high of $54.62. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $53.05 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$189m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Dividend payout 94% of earnings on a 4.3% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. ROE 6% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where NJR and POR diverge

On the headline score the gap is 11.3 points in favor of NJR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.