COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

NJR vs PCG

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. NJR scored 63.2, PCG scored 61.1 — NJR leads.
Compare another set
NJR
New Jersey Resources Corporation
Utilities - Regulated Gas · Quality-Growth
63.2
$53.52 · $5.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.1
NJR leads
PCG
PG&E Corporation
Utilities - Regulated Electric · Quality-Growth
61.1
$17.60 · $38.8B
fundamentals as of
  • Fastest growthNJR+7.0%
  • Strongest balance sheetNJR1.47
  • Highest qualityNJR77 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueNJR-26%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD63.2/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY76.6GROWTH48.4VALUE68.0
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD61.1/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY43.6GROWTH68.6VALUE76.2
NJRPCGQuality76.643.6Growth48.468.6Value68.076.2
FCFNJR$359mPCG-$4.3b
RevNJR+7.0%PCG+5.7%
D/ENJR1.47PCG1.89
PEGNJR2.13PCG0.76
NJR
stronger →← stronger
PCG
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
44
48
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
69
68
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
76
PCG is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
NJR
PCG
$359mC
FCF
-$4.3bF
+7.0%C+
Rev
+5.7%C+
1.47B
D/E
1.89C
14.8xA-
P/E
2.13C
PEG
0.76A-
P/S
1.5xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
NJR
PCG
26% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
~-7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
+46%
1-yr DCF upside
+35%
5-yr DCF upside
+20%
10-yr DCF upside
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
NJR
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
PCG
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
NJRNew Jersey Resources Corporation
Utilities - Regulated Gas · $53.52 · beta 0.53
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Gas · market cap $5.4b. 12% off the 52-week high of $60.86. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $60.00 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Net margin 24% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
PCGPG&E Corporation
Utilities - Regulated Electric · $17.60 · beta 0.28
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $38.8b. 8% off the 52-week high of $19.16. PEG 0.76 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $22.78 (implying +29% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$4.3b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where NJR and PCG diverge

On the headline score the gap is 2.1 points in favor of NJR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.