COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
GDDY vs NICE
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GDDY scored 85.4, NICE scored 82.2 — GDDY leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. GDDY's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but NICE's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
GDDY
GoDaddy Inc.
85.4
$97.07 · $12.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.2
GDDY leads
NICE
NICE Ltd.
82.2
$100.24 · $5.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestGDDY14.4x
- Fastest growthNICE+7.7%
- Highest qualityGDDY95 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueGDDY-64%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GDDY
stronger →← stronger
NICE
95
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
84
75
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
76
87
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
87
NICE is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GDDY
NICE
$1.7bC+
FCF
$698mC+
+7.4%B
Rev
+7.7%B
—
D/E
0.02A-
14.4xA-
P/E
14.6xA-
0.68A-
PEG
0.75A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GDDY
NICE
64% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
54% below
~-15%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-10%/yr
+142%
1-yr DCF upside
+92%
+181%
5-yr DCF upside
+119%
+249%
10-yr DCF upside
+165%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GDDY
Why this score
- Buying back stock
NICE
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
GDDYGoDaddy Inc.
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $12.3b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $150.47 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.68 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $104.80 (implying +8% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 187% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
NICENICE Ltd.
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $5.9b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $153.68 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.75 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $125.85 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 114% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
GDDY leads NICE by 1.5 points (85.4 to 83.9), its sharpest advantage coming in P/E (grade A). A contrarian could still prefer NICE, which trades about 54% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward. All screen as value-type names but sit in different sectors (Software - Infrastructure versus Software - Application), so their grades are relative to different peer sets.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GDDY and NICE diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.2 points in favor of GDDY. The widest single difference is Quality, where GDDY leads by 11.7 points.
- QualityGDDY 95.4 · NICE 83.7GDDY +11.7
- GrowthGDDY 75.3 · NICE 76.0level
- ValueGDDY 86.8 · NICE 87.4level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.