COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CRM vs NICE
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CRM scored 84.0, NICE scored 82.2 — CRM leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. CRM's fundamentals are as of April 2026, but NICE's are as of December 2025 — a 4-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
84
$209.17
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.8
CRM leads
NICE
NICE Ltd.
82.2
$100.24 · $5.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestNICE14.6x
- Fastest growthCRM+11.0%
- Strongest balance sheetNICE0.02
- Highest qualityNICE84 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueNICE-54%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CRM
NICE
$14.7bA-
FCF
$698mC+
+11.0%B
Rev
+7.7%B
1.24C
D/E
0.02A-
24.2xB+
P/E
14.6xA-
0.86B+
PEG
0.75A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CRM
NICE
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
54% below
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-10%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
+92%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+119%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+165%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CRM
No notable signals flagged.
NICE
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
CRMSalesforce, Inc.
Why now
Software - Application · market cap n/a. Down 22% from 52-week high of $269.11 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.86 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 52 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $243.08 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 23% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 183% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
NICENICE Ltd.
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $5.9b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $153.68 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.75 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $125.85 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 114% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.