COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
FOX vs NFLX
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FOX scored 58.9, NFLX scored 73.6 — NFLX leads.
Compare another set
FOX
Fox Corporation
58.9
$61.05 · $25.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
14.7
NFLX leads
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
73.6
$79.59 · $331.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestFOX15.9x
- Fastest growthNFLX+16.0%
- Strongest balance sheetNFLX0.55
- Highest qualityNFLX93 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueFOX-28%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FOX
stronger →← stronger
NFLX
73
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
93
67
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
88
42
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
49
NFLX is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FOX
NFLX
$1.5bC+
FCF
$11.2bA-
+5.1%C+
Rev
+16.0%B+
0.64B
D/E
0.55B
15.9xB+
P/E
25.0xC+
—
PEG
1.80C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FOX
NFLX
28% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
163% above
~-3%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~31%/yr
+35%
1-yr DCF upside
-64%
+38%
5-yr DCF upside
-62%
+44%
10-yr DCF upside
-60%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FOX
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Short track record
NFLX
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
FOXFox Corporation
Why now
Entertainment · market cap $25.6b. 10% off the 52-week high of $68.17.
Moat
ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
NFLXNetflix, Inc.
Why now
Entertainment · market cap $331.4b. Down 37% from 52-week high of $126.71 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. 45 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $93.42 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
Net margin 28% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 45% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $331.4b market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Down 37% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.51 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FOX and NFLX diverge
On the headline score the gap is 14.7 points in favor of NFLX. The widest single difference is Growth, where NFLX leads by 21.0 points.
- GrowthFOX 66.7 · NFLX 87.7NFLX +21.0
- QualityFOX 73.1 · NFLX 92.6NFLX +19.5
- ValueFOX 41.8 · NFLX 49.0NFLX +7.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.