COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
NEXA vs ORLA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. NEXA scored 58.1, ORLA scored 65.2 — ORLA leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. ORLA's fundamentals are as of March 2026, but NEXA's are as of December 2025 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
NEXA
Nexa Resources S.A.
58.1
$15.40 · $2.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
7.1
ORLA leads
ORLA
Orla Mining Ltd
65.2
$9.44 · $3.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestNEXA7.4x
- Fastest growthORLA+207.6%
- Strongest balance sheetORLA0.42
- Highest qualityORLA81 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueORLA-35%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
NEXA
stronger →← stronger
ORLA
54
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
81
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
73
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
68
NEXA and ORLA split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
NEXA
ORLA
$13mC-
FCF
$359mC
+8.5%B
Rev
+207.6%A
1.25C
D/E
0.42B
7.4xA
P/E
13.1xA-
0.31A
PEG
1.34B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
NEXA
ORLA
570% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
35% below
>60%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-4%/yr
-88%
1-yr DCF upside
+40%
-85%
5-yr DCF upside
+53%
-79%
10-yr DCF upside
+72%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
NEXA
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
- Cyclical growth
ORLA
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
- Short track record
The companies
NEXANexa Resources S.A.
Why now
Other Industrial Metals & Mining · market cap $2.0b. 9% off the 52-week high of $16.89. PEG 0.31 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $14.88 (implying -3% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Mining moat is reserve quality + extraction cost per unit — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the commodity cycle while marginal producers burn it.
Risk
Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
ORLAOrla Mining Ltd
Why now
Gold · market cap $3.5b. Down 57% from 52-week high of $21.98 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +208% — in hypergrowth territory.
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 42% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 142% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 57% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where NEXA and ORLA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 7.1 points in favor of ORLA. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityNEXA 53.8 · ORLA 81.0ORLA +27.2
- ValueNEXA 72.9 · ORLA 68.4NEXA +4.5
- GrowthNEXA 50.0 · ORLA 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.