COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
MWH vs NEE
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MWH scored 72.0, NEE scored 60.1 — MWH leads.
Compare another set
MWH
SOLV Energy, Inc.
72
$28.34 · $5.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
11.9
MWH leads
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
60.1
$83.65 · $174.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestNEE19.1x
- Fastest growthMWH+34.8%
- Strongest balance sheetMWH0.10
- Highest qualityMWH75 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueMWH-34%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
MWH
stronger →← stronger
NEE
75
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
61
95
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
56
87
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
64
MWH is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
MWH
NEE
$368mC
FCF
$3.0bB
+34.8%A
Rev
+8.3%B
0.10A
D/E
1.62C+
48.0xD
P/E
19.1xB+
1.17B+
PEG
1.88C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
MWH
NEE
34% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
147% above
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~29%/yr
+15%
1-yr DCF upside
-63%
+51%
5-yr DCF upside
-59%
+125%
10-yr DCF upside
-54%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
MWH
Why this score
- Short track record
NEE
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
MWHSOLV Energy, Inc.
Why now
Utilities - Renewable · market cap $5.7b. Down 41% from 52-week high of $48.40 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +35% — in hypergrowth territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $45.18 (implying +59% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 41% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 48x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Net margin 3.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
NEENextEra Energy, Inc.
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $174.5b. 15% off the 52-week high of $98.75. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $98.50 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Net margin 31% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. $174.5b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
MWH leads NEE by 9.4 points (72.0 to 62.6), its sharpest advantage coming in Rev (grade A). A contrarian could still prefer NEE for its stronger P/E (grade B). All screen as growth-type names but sit in different sectors (Utilities - Renewable versus Utilities - Regulated Electric), so their grades are relative to different peer sets.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where MWH and NEE diverge
On the headline score the gap is 11.9 points in favor of MWH. The widest single difference is Growth, where MWH leads by 39.2 points.
- GrowthMWH 95.2 · NEE 56.0MWH +39.2
- ValueMWH 86.5 · NEE 63.8MWH +22.7
- QualityMWH 74.9 · NEE 60.9MWH +14.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.