COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
META vs NBIS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. META scored 79.1, NBIS scored 62.2 — META leads.
Compare another set
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
79.1
$549.90 · $1.4T
fundamentals as of
Score gap
16.9
META leads
NBIS
Nebius Group N.V.
62.2
$219.13 · $59.6B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthNBIS+53.4%
- Strongest balance sheetMETA0.43
- Highest qualityMETA86 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
META
stronger →← stronger
NBIS
86
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
40
92
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
98
62
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
62
META and NBIS split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
META
NBIS
$41.0bA
FCF
-$3.2bF
+27.7%A-
Rev
+53.4%A
0.43B+
D/E
0.99C+
20.7xB
P/E
—
0.82B+
PEG
0.63A-
—
P/S
44.0xD
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
META
NBIS
130% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~30%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-61%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-57%
5-yr DCF upside
—
-50%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
META
Why this score
- Durable high returns
NBIS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Short track record
The companies
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $1.4T. Down 30% from 52-week high of $790.80 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +28% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.82 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 57 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $754.14 (implying +37% upside).
Moat
Net margin 30% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $1.4T market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
NBISNebius Group N.V.
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $59.6b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $299.86 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +53% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.63 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $271.85 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
$59.6b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$3.2b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Beta 1.43 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. P/S 44.0x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where META and NBIS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 16.9 points in favor of META. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityMETA 86.4 · NBIS 39.7META +46.7
- GrowthMETA 92.4 · NBIS 98.0NBIS +5.6
- ValueMETA 61.8 · NBIS 61.7level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.