COMPARE · Data as of August 12, 2026

BRBR vs MZTI

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BRBR scored 72.0, MZTI scored 65.5 — BRBR leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. BRBR's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but MZTI's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BRBR
BellRing Brands, Inc.
Packaged Foods · Quality-Growth
72
$10.85 · $1.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.5
BRBR leads
MZTI
The Marzetti Company
Packaged Foods · Quality-Growth
65.5
$115.90 · $3.2B
fundamentals as of
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD72.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY62.1GROWTH66.7VALUE97.5
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD65.5/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY83.0GROWTH59.9VALUE56.4
BRBR
stronger →← stronger
MZTI
62
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
83
67
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
60
97
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
56
BRBR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
BRBR
MZTI
$225mC
FCF
$248mC
+16.1%B+
Rev
+2.8%C
D/E
0.04A
8.2xA
P/E
18.2xB+
0.51A-
PEG
3.12D
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
BRBR
MZTI
85% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
20% below
decline
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~0%/yr
+413%
1-yr DCF upside
+19%
+582%
5-yr DCF upside
+26%
+954%
10-yr DCF upside
+35%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
BRBR
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Short track record
MZTI
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
  • Durable high returns
BRBRBellRing Brands, Inc.
Packaged Foods · $10.85 · beta 0.52
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $1.3b. Down 75% from 52-week high of $43.02 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.51 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $14.71 (implying +36% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 131% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 75% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. ROE -37% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
MZTIThe Marzetti Company
Packaged Foods · $115.90 · beta 0.35
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $3.2b. Down 39% from 52-week high of $190.96 — deep drawdown territory. 5 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $159.40 (implying +38% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 141% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 39% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where BRBR and MZTI diverge

On the headline score the gap is 6.5 points in favour of BRBR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.