COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
MWH vs RNW
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MWH scored 72.0, RNW scored 54.9 — MWH leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. MWH's fundamentals are as of March 2026, but RNW's are as of March 2025 — a 12-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
MWH
SOLV Energy, Inc.
72
$28.34 · $5.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
17.1
MWH leads
RNW
ReNew Energy Global Plc
54.9
$6.81 · $2.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthMWH+34.8%
- Strongest balance sheetMWH0.10
- Highest qualityMWH75 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueMWH-34%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
MWH
stronger →← stronger
RNW
75
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
30
95
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
86
87
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
90
MWH is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
MWH
RNW
$368mC
FCF
-$49mF
+34.8%A
Rev
+19.4%B+
0.10A
D/E
5.25D
48.0xD
P/E
—
1.17B+
PEG
0.14A
—
P/S
1.7xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
MWH
RNW
34% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
+15%
1-yr DCF upside
—
+51%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+125%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
MWH
Why this score
- Short track record
RNW
Why this score
- Foreign reporter (INR)
The companies
MWHSOLV Energy, Inc.
Why now
Utilities - Renewable · market cap $5.7b. Down 41% from 52-week high of $48.40 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +35% — in hypergrowth territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $45.18 (implying +59% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 41% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 48x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Net margin 3.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
RNWReNew Energy Global Plc
Why now
Utilities - Renewable · market cap $2.5b. 17% off the 52-week high of $8.24. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.14 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $7.92 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
D/E 5.25 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$49m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Net margin 4.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where MWH and RNW diverge
On the headline score the gap is 17.1 points in favor of MWH. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityMWH 74.9 · RNW 29.6MWH +45.3
- GrowthMWH 95.2 · RNW 85.5MWH +9.7
- ValueMWH 86.5 · RNW 89.6RNW +3.1
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.