COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
MWH vs NRG
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MWH scored 72.0, NRG scored 60.9 — MWH leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. NRG's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but MWH's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
MWH
SOLV Energy, Inc.
72
$28.34 · $5.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
11.1
MWH leads
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
60.9
$113.11 · $23.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestNRG29.5x
- Fastest growthMWH+34.8%
- Strongest balance sheetMWH0.10
- Highest qualityMWH75 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueMWH-34%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
MWH
stronger →← stronger
NRG
75
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
45
95
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
77
87
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
65
MWH is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
MWH
NRG
$368mC
FCF
$348mC
+34.8%A
Rev
+12.4%B+
0.10A
D/E
4.83D
48.0xD
P/E
29.5xC
1.17B+
PEG
0.58A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
MWH
NRG
34% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
239% above
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~48%/yr
+15%
1-yr DCF upside
-77%
+51%
5-yr DCF upside
-70%
+125%
10-yr DCF upside
-56%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
MWH
Why this score
- Short track record
NRG
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Diluting shareholders
The companies
MWHSOLV Energy, Inc.
Why now
Utilities - Renewable · market cap $5.7b. Down 41% from 52-week high of $48.40 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +35% — in hypergrowth territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $45.18 (implying +59% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 41% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 48x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Net margin 3.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
NRGNRG Energy, Inc.
Why now
Utilities - Independent Power Producers · market cap $23.8b. Down 40% from 52-week high of $189.96 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.58 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $188.75 (implying +67% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
D/E 4.83 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 40% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 2.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where MWH and NRG diverge
On the headline score the gap is 11.1 points in favor of MWH. The widest single difference is Quality, where MWH leads by 30.0 points.
- QualityMWH 74.9 · NRG 44.9MWH +30.0
- ValueMWH 86.5 · NRG 65.1MWH +21.4
- GrowthMWH 95.2 · NRG 77.2MWH +18.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.