Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MUR scored 42.5, EQT scored 62.8 — EQT leads.
Compare another set
MUR
Murphy Oil Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · Quality-Growth
42.5
$38.68 · $5.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
20.3
EQT leads
EQT
EQT Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · Quality-Growth
62.8
$52.83 · $33.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestEQT12.3x
Fastest growthEQT+60.0%
Strongest balance sheetEQT0.20
Highest qualityEQT72 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueEQT-72%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
MUR
stronger →← stronger
EQT
57
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
72
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
27
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
68
EQT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
MUR
EQT
$222mC
FCF
$3.8bB
+7.7%B
Rev
+60.0%A
0.42B+
D/E
0.20A-
19.1xC+
P/E
12.3xB+
0.33A
PEG
1.55C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
MUR
EQT
5% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
72% below
~7%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-15%/yr
-9%
1-yr DCF upside
+175%
-5%
5-yr DCF upside
+252%
+1%
10-yr DCF upside
+412%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
MUR
Why this score
Raising its dividend
Cyclical growth
EQT
Why this score
Cyclical growth
The companies
MURMurphy Oil Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · $38.68 · beta 0.58
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $5.5b. 11% off the 52-week high of $43.34. PEG 0.33 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $40.21 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
ROE 6% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate. Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
EQTEQT Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · $52.83 · beta 0.65
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $33.0b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $68.24 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +60% — in hypergrowth territory. 26 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $67.19 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
Net margin 29% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 139% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where MUR and EQT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 20.3 points in favor of EQT. The widest single difference is Value, where EQT leads by 41.7 points.
ValueMUR 26.7 · EQT 68.4EQT +41.7
QualityMUR 57.3 · EQT 72.4EQT +15.1
GrowthMUR 50.0 · EQT 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is EQT or MUR the better stock?
EQT scores higher: EQT 62.8, MUR 42.5 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do EQT and MUR differ most?
The widest gap is value, where EQT leads by 42 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. EQT also leads quality, while growth is effectively level between them.
How are EQT and MUR scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.