COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

MTCH vs PINS

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MTCH scored 69.3, PINS scored 68.8 — MTCH leads.
Compare another set
MTCH
Match Group, Inc.
Internet Content & Information · Quality-Growth
69.3
$40.87 · $9.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.5
MTCH leads
PINS
Pinterest, Inc.
Internet Content & Information · Quality-Growth
68.8
$23.40 · $13.3B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestMTCH14.5x
  • Fastest growthPINS+16.6%
  • Highest qualityMTCH73 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valuePINS-53%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD69.3/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY73.1GROWTH54.5VALUE83.7
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD68.8/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY62.3GROWTH85.8VALUE60.8
MTCHPINSQuality73.162.3Growth54.585.8Value83.760.8
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-8%12%+9.5x19x+MTCHoff-scalePINS

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFMTCH$1.1bPINS$1.3b
RevMTCH+1.7%PINS+16.6%
P/EMTCH14.5xPINS68.8x
PEGMTCH0.36PINS0.36
MTCH
stronger →← stronger
PINS
73
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
62
54
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
86
84
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
61
MTCH is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
MTCH
PINS
$1.1bC+
FCF
$1.3bC+
+1.7%C
Rev
+16.6%B+
D/E
0.41B+
14.5xB+
P/E
68.8xC
0.36A
PEG
0.36A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
MTCH
PINS
49% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
53% below
~-6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-7%/yr
+62%
1-yr DCF upside
+76%
+95%
5-yr DCF upside
+114%
+155%
10-yr DCF upside
+185%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
MTCH
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Cut its dividend
PINS
No notable signals flagged.
MTCHMatch Group, Inc.
Internet Content & Information · $40.87 · beta 1.32
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $9.5b. Trading near 52-week high of $41.40 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $41.81 (implying +2% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -1.2%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
PINSPinterest, Inc.
Internet Content & Information · $23.40 · beta 0.91
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $13.3b. Down 39% from 52-week high of $38.57 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 36 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $28.99 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 68.8x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 39% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where MTCH and PINS diverge

On the headline score the gap is 0.5 points in favor of MTCH. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.