COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
MTCH vs OPRA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MTCH scored 69.3, OPRA scored 73.1 — OPRA leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. MTCH's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but OPRA's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
MTCH
Match Group, Inc.
69.3
$40.87 · $9.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.8
OPRA leads
OPRA
Opera Limited
73.1
$18.96 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestOPRA13.7x
- Fastest growthOPRA+27.9%
- Highest qualityMTCH73 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueMTCH-49%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
MTCH
stronger →← stronger
OPRA
73
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
54
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
95
84
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
59
MTCH is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
MTCH
OPRA
$1.1bC+
FCF
$112mC
+1.7%C
Rev
+27.9%A-
—
D/E
0.01A
14.5xB+
P/E
13.7xB+
0.36A
PEG
0.54A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
MTCH
OPRA
49% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
35% below
~-6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~4%/yr
+62%
1-yr DCF upside
+18%
+95%
5-yr DCF upside
+54%
+155%
10-yr DCF upside
+128%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
MTCH
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cut its dividend
OPRA
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
The companies
MTCHMatch Group, Inc.
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $9.5b. Trading near 52-week high of $41.40 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $41.81 (implying +2% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -1.2%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
OPRAOpera Limited
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $1.7b. 10% off the 52-week high of $21.06. Revenue growing +28% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.54 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $26.29 (implying +39% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 104% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Dividend payout 87% of earnings on a 4.4% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
OPRA leads MTCH by 1.6 points (74.8 to 73.2), its sharpest advantage coming in Rev (grade A-). A contrarian could still prefer MTCH, which trades about 33% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where MTCH and OPRA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.8 points in favor of OPRA. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthMTCH 54.5 · OPRA 95.4OPRA +40.9
- ValueMTCH 83.7 · OPRA 59.0MTCH +24.7
- QualityMTCH 73.1 · OPRA 69.3MTCH +3.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.