COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
META vs MTCH
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. META scored 79.1, MTCH scored 69.3 — META leads.
Compare another set
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
79.1
$549.90 · $1.4T
fundamentals as of
Score gap
9.8
META leads
MTCH
Match Group, Inc.
69.3
$40.87 · $9.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestMTCH14.5x
- Fastest growthMETA+27.7%
- Highest qualityMETA86 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueMTCH-49%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
META
stronger →← stronger
MTCH
86
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
73
92
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
54
62
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
84
META is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
META
MTCH
$41.0bA
FCF
$1.1bC+
+27.7%A-
Rev
+1.7%C
0.43B+
D/E
—
20.7xB
P/E
14.5xB+
0.82B+
PEG
0.36A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
META
MTCH
130% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
49% below
~30%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-6%/yr
-61%
1-yr DCF upside
+62%
-57%
5-yr DCF upside
+95%
-50%
10-yr DCF upside
+155%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
META
Why this score
- Durable high returns
MTCH
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cut its dividend
The companies
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $1.4T. Down 30% from 52-week high of $790.80 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +28% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.82 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 57 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $754.14 (implying +37% upside).
Moat
Net margin 30% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $1.4T market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
MTCHMatch Group, Inc.
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $9.5b. Trading near 52-week high of $41.40 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $41.81 (implying +2% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -1.2%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
The model favors META (79.7) over MTCH (73.2) primarily due to its exceptional Growth pillar score of 97, significantly outpacing MTCH's 63, and reflected in META's A- revenue growth grade. However, a contrarian investor might prefer MTCH for its substantial 33% discount to our DCF fair value and its implied growth of -4% per year, suggesting low market expectations. It's worth noting MTCH has a "Cut its dividend" signal, indicating potential operational headwinds.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where META and MTCH diverge
On the headline score the gap is 9.8 points in favor of META. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthMETA 92.4 · MTCH 54.5META +37.9
- ValueMETA 61.8 · MTCH 83.7MTCH +21.9
- QualityMETA 86.4 · MTCH 73.1META +13.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.