Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MSGE scored 58.6, ROKU scored 48.3 — MSGE leads.
Compare another set
MSGE
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
Entertainment · Quality-Growth
58.6
$80.84 · $3.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
10.3
MSGE leads
ROKU
Roku, Inc.
Entertainment · Quality-Growth
48.3
$152.85 · $22.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestMSGE58.6x
Fastest growthROKU+18.5%
Highest qualityMSGE83 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueMSGE-57%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
MSGE
stronger →← stronger
ROKU
83
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
56
86
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
88
28
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
23
MSGE is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
MSGE
ROKU
$323mC
FCF
$710mC+
+12.5%B+
Rev
+18.5%B+
—
D/E
0.17A-
58.6xC
P/E
65.0xC
11.16D
PEG
0.60A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
MSGE
ROKU
57% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
140% above
~-11%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~39%/yr
+109%
1-yr DCF upside
-66%
+134%
5-yr DCF upside
-58%
+179%
10-yr DCF upside
-44%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
MSGE
Why this score
Durable high returns
ROKU
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
The companies
MSGEMadison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
Entertainment · $80.84 · beta 0.56
Why now
Entertainment · market cap $3.8b. 11% off the 52-week high of $90.41. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $91.63 (implying +13% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income, mostly because of cash released from working capital ($181m) — a release that doesn't repeat every year the way earnings can.
Risk
Trailing P/E 58.6x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating.
ROKURoku, Inc.
Entertainment · $152.85 · beta 2.05
Why now
Entertainment · market cap $22.7b. 4% off the 52-week high of $159.89. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.60 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $162.33 (implying +6% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 200% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Trailing P/E 65.0x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Beta 2.05 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where MSGE and ROKU diverge
On the headline score the gap is 10.3 points in favor of MSGE. The widest single difference is Quality, where MSGE leads by 27.9 points.
QualityMSGE 83.5 · ROKU 55.6MSGE +27.9
ValueMSGE 28.1 · ROKU 23.0MSGE +5.1
GrowthMSGE 85.8 · ROKU 88.2level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is MSGE or ROKU the better stock?
MSGE scores higher: MSGE 58.6, ROKU 48.3 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do MSGE and ROKU differ most?
The widest gap is quality, where MSGE leads by 28 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. MSGE also leads value, while growth is effectively level between them.
How are MSGE and ROKU scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.