COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
MSGE vs NYT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MSGE scored 72.0, NYT scored 68.8 — MSGE leads.
Compare another set
MSGE
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
72
$79.89 · $3.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.2
MSGE leads
NYT
New York Times Company (The)
68.8
$65.69 · $10.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestNYT27.4x
- Fastest growthMSGE+12.5%
- Highest qualityMSGE85 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueMSGE-66%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
MSGE
stronger →← stronger
NYT
85
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
83
79
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
83
60
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
47
MSGE is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
MSGE
NYT
$313mC
FCF
$623mC+
+12.5%B+
Rev
+10.8%B
57.9xC
P/E
27.4xC+
0.36A
PEG
3.79D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
MSGE
NYT
66% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
5% below
~-11%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
+124%
1-yr DCF upside
-3%
+198%
5-yr DCF upside
+5%
+358%
10-yr DCF upside
+18%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
MSGE
Why this score
- Short track record
NYT
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
MSGEMadison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
Why now
Entertainment · market cap $3.8b. 12% off the 52-week high of $90.41. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $91.63 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 57.9x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating.
NYTNew York Times Company (The)
Why now
Publishing · market cap $10.6b. Down 25% from 52-week high of $87.10 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $77.67 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 159% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where MSGE and NYT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.2 points in favor of MSGE. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueMSGE 59.5 · NYT 47.0MSGE +12.5
- GrowthMSGE 79.0 · NYT 83.0NYT +4.0
- QualityMSGE 84.6 · NYT 83.3level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.