COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
MOS vs STDN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MOS scored 34.9, STDN scored 44.8 — STDN leads.
Compare another set
MOS
The Mosaic Company
34.9
$24.00 · $7.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
9.9
STDN leads
STDN
Standard Nuclear, Inc.
44.8
$11.94 · $1.9B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthSTDN+57.1%
- Highest qualitySTDN45 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
MOS
stronger →← stronger
STDN
31
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
45
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
28
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
40
STDN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
MOS
STDN
-$947mF
FCF
—
+8.8%B
Rev
+57.1%A
0.52C+
D/E
—
0.6xA
P/S
—
2.02C
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
MOS
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
STDN
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
- Short track record
The companies
MOSThe Mosaic Company
Why now
Agricultural Inputs · market cap $7.6b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $36.99 — deep drawdown territory. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $26.47 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$947m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Currently unprofitable (margin -5.2%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
STDNStandard Nuclear, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Chemicals · market cap $1.9b. 15% off the 52-week high of $13.98. Revenue growing +57% — in hypergrowth territory. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $16.00 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Higher-variance name — the thesis leans on growth and valuation rather than a long, settled track record, so it depends on execution continuing. Position size accordingly; a deep drawdown shouldn't change the thesis.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where MOS and STDN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 9.9 points in favor of STDN. The widest single difference is Quality, where STDN leads by 14.5 points.
- QualityMOS 30.5 · STDN 45.0STDN +14.5
- ValueMOS 27.8 · STDN 40.0STDN +12.2
- GrowthMOS 50.0 · STDN 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.