Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MOS scored 19.9, PPG scored 54.1 — PPG leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. MOS's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but PPG's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
MOS
The Mosaic Company
Agricultural Inputs · Quality-Growth
19.9
$18.74 · $6.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
34.2
PPG leads
PPG
PPG Industries, Inc.
Specialty Chemicals · Quality-Growth
54.1
$103.96 · $23.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthMOS+8.8%
Strongest balance sheetMOS0.52
Highest qualityPPG70 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
MOS
stronger →← stronger
PPG
32
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
70
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
46
5
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
49
PPG is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
MOS
PPG
-$947mF
FCF
$1.2bC+
+8.8%B
Rev
+2.8%C
0.52C+
D/E
0.87C
0.5xA
P/S
—
2.02C
PEG
1.51C+
—
P/E
15.2xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
MOS
PPG
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
35% above
—
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~11%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-25%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-26%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-27%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
MOS
Why this score
Cyclical growth
PPG
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
MOSThe Mosaic Company
Agricultural Inputs · $18.74 · beta 0.92
Why now
Agricultural Inputs · market cap $6.0b. Down 42% from 52-week high of $32.25 — deep drawdown territory. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $26.66 (implying +42% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$947m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Currently unprofitable (margin -5.2%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 42% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
PPGPPG Industries, Inc.
Specialty Chemicals · $103.96 · beta 1.05
Why now
Specialty Chemicals · market cap $23.1b. Down 22% from 52-week high of $133.43 — deep drawdown territory. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $125.57 (implying +21% upside).
Moat
ROE 20% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where MOS and PPG diverge
On the headline score the gap is 34.2 points in favor of PPG. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueMOS 5.0 · PPG 48.5PPG +43.5
QualityMOS 31.6 · PPG 70.4PPG +38.8
GrowthMOS 50.0 · PPG 46.4MOS +3.6
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is PPG or MOS the better stock?
PPG scores higher: PPG 54.1, MOS 19.9 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do PPG and MOS differ most?
The widest gap is value, where PPG leads by 44 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are PPG and MOS scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.