COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
IOSP vs MOS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. IOSP scored 60.9, MOS scored 34.9 — IOSP leads.
Compare another set
IOSP
Innospec Inc.
60.9
$94.73 · $2.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
26.0
IOSP leads
MOS
The Mosaic Company
34.9
$24.00 · $7.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthMOS+8.8%
- Strongest balance sheetIOSP0.04
- Highest qualityIOSP65 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueIOSP-13%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
IOSP
stronger →← stronger
MOS
65
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
31
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
70
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
28
IOSP is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
IOSP
MOS
$107mC
FCF
-$947mF
+2.9%C
Rev
+8.8%B
0.04A
D/E
0.52C+
19.3xB
P/E
—
0.66A-
PEG
2.02C
—
P/S
0.6xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
IOSP
MOS
13% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~11%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-12%
1-yr DCF upside
—
+15%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+72%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
IOSP
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
MOS
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
The companies
IOSPInnospec Inc.
Why now
Specialty Chemicals · market cap $2.3b. Trading near 52-week high of $95.01 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. PEG 0.66 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $101.00 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Trading within 0% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
MOSThe Mosaic Company
Why now
Agricultural Inputs · market cap $7.6b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $36.99 — deep drawdown territory. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $26.47 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$947m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Currently unprofitable (margin -5.2%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where IOSP and MOS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 26.0 points in favor of IOSP. The widest single difference is Value, where IOSP leads by 42.0 points.
- ValueIOSP 69.8 · MOS 27.8IOSP +42.0
- QualityIOSP 64.7 · MOS 30.5IOSP +34.2
- GrowthIOSP 50.0 · MOS 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.