COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
MNSO vs TJX
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MNSO scored 66.9, TJX scored 49.5 — MNSO leads.
Compare another set
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
66.9
$11.02 · $3.3B
Score gap
17.4
MNSO leads
TJX
The TJX Companies, Inc.
49.5
$140.71 · $155.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestMNSO11.1x
- Fastest growthMNSO+26.2%
- Strongest balance sheetMNSO1.04
- Highest qualityMNSO79 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
MNSO
stronger →← stronger
TJX
79
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
79
96
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
65
71
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
24
MNSO is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
MNSO
TJX
—
FCF
$5.5bB+
+26.2%A-
Rev
+8.1%B
1.04B
D/E
1.34C+
11.1xA-
P/E
26.1xC+
0.86B+
PEG
3.00C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
MNSO
TJX
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
16% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~10%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-21%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-13%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-1%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
MNSO
Why this score
- Short track record
- Foreign reporter (CNY)
TJX
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
MNSOMINISO Group Holding Limited
Why now
Specialty Retail · market cap $3.3b. Down 58% from 52-week high of $26.20 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.86 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $19.08 (implying +73% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Down 58% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
TJXThe TJX Companies, Inc.
Why now
Apparel Retail · market cap $155.4b. 17% off the 52-week high of $170.00. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $172.80 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
ROE 56% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $155.4b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where MNSO and TJX diverge
On the headline score the gap is 17.4 points in favor of MNSO. The widest single difference is Value, where MNSO leads by 47.8 points.
- ValueMNSO 71.5 · TJX 23.7MNSO +47.8
- GrowthMNSO 95.7 · TJX 65.0MNSO +30.7
- QualityMNSO 79.2 · TJX 78.8level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.