COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026

MNSO vs SBH

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MNSO scored 69.9, SBH scored 62.4 — MNSO leads.
Compare another set
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
Specialty Retail · Quality-Growth
69.9
$11.26 · $3.4B
Score gap
7.5
MNSO leads
SBH
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.
Specialty Retail · Quality-Growth
62.4
$16.42 · $1.5B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestSBH8.6x
  • Fastest growthMNSO+26.2%
  • Strongest balance sheetMNSO1.04
  • Highest qualityMNSO90 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueSBH-60%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD69.9/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY89.9GROWTH95.7VALUE72.1
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD62.4/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY73.5GROWTH44.2VALUE74.8
MNSOSBHQuality89.973.5Growth95.744.2Value72.174.8
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-9%36%3.6x16xMNSOSBH

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

RevMNSO+26.2%SBH+1.1%
D/EMNSO1.04SBH1.74
P/EMNSO11.1xSBH8.6x
PEGMNSO0.87SBH0.72
MNSO
stronger →← stronger
SBH
90
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
73
96
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
44
72
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
75
MNSO is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
MNSO
SBH
FCF
$241mC
+26.2%A-
Rev
+1.1%C
1.04B
D/E
1.74C+
11.1xA-
P/E
8.6xA
0.87B+
PEG
0.72A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
MNSO
SBH
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
60% below
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-16%/yr
1-yr DCF upside
+135%
5-yr DCF upside
+152%
10-yr DCF upside
+179%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
MNSO
Why this score
  • Short track record
  • Foreign reporter (CNY)
SBH
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Durable high returns
MNSOMINISO Group Holding Limited
Specialty Retail · $11.26 · beta 0.13
Why now
Specialty Retail · market cap $3.4b. Down 57% from 52-week high of $25.92 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.87 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $19.10 (implying +70% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 25% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 57% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
SBHSally Beauty Holdings, Inc.
Specialty Retail · $16.42 · beta 1.04
Why now
Specialty Retail · market cap $1.5b. 8% off the 52-week high of $17.92. PEG 0.72 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 5 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $17.00 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 125% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where MNSO and SBH diverge

On the headline score the gap is 7.5 points in favor of MNSO. The widest single difference is Growth, where MNSO leads by 51.5 points.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.