COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
FIVE vs MNSO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FIVE scored 73.1, MNSO scored 66.9 — FIVE leads.
Compare another set
FIVE
Five Below, Inc.
73.1
$263.07 · $14.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.2
FIVE leads
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
66.9
$11.02 · $3.3B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestMNSO11.1x
- Fastest growthMNSO+26.2%
- Strongest balance sheetFIVE0.86
- Highest qualityMNSO79 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FIVE
stronger →← stronger
MNSO
73
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
79
94
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
96
57
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
71
MNSO is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FIVE
MNSO
$505mC+
FCF
—
+25.9%A-
Rev
+26.2%A-
0.86B
D/E
1.04B
33.2xC
P/E
11.1xA-
0.98B+
PEG
0.86B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FIVE
MNSO
72% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~19%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-45%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-42%
5-yr DCF upside
—
-36%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FIVE
Why this score
- Durable high returns
MNSO
Why this score
- Short track record
- Foreign reporter (CNY)
The companies
FIVEFive Below, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Retail · market cap $14.5b. Trading near 52-week high of $263.26 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.98 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $269.81 (implying +3% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 115% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 0% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
MNSOMINISO Group Holding Limited
Why now
Specialty Retail · market cap $3.3b. Down 58% from 52-week high of $26.20 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.86 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $19.08 (implying +73% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Down 58% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
FIVE leads MNSO by 1.1 points (73.1 to 72.0). A contrarian could still prefer MNSO for its stronger P/E (grade A-).
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FIVE and MNSO diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.2 points in favor of FIVE. The widest single difference is Value, where MNSO leads by 14.6 points.
- ValueFIVE 56.9 · MNSO 71.5MNSO +14.6
- QualityFIVE 72.8 · MNSO 79.2MNSO +6.4
- GrowthFIVE 94.2 · MNSO 95.7level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.