COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ADSK vs MNDY
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ADSK scored 82.2, MNDY scored 73.5 — ADSK leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. ADSK's fundamentals are as of April 2026, but MNDY's are as of December 2025 — a 4-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
ADSK
Autodesk, Inc.
82.2
$253.68 · $53.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
8.7
ADSK leads
MNDY
monday.com Ltd.
73.5
$92.90 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestADSK37.0x
- Fastest growthMNDY+26.7%
- Strongest balance sheetMNDY0.38
- Highest qualityADSK88 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueMNDY-38%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ADSK
stronger →← stronger
MNDY
88
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
46
86
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
92
73
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
93
MNDY is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ADSK
MNDY
$2.7bB
FCF
$313mC
+18.3%B+
Rev
+26.7%A-
0.85C+
D/E
0.38B
37.0xB
P/E
39.4xB
0.96B+
PEG
0.28A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ADSK
MNDY
33% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
38% below
~16%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~1%/yr
-33%
1-yr DCF upside
+27%
-25%
5-yr DCF upside
+61%
-10%
10-yr DCF upside
+128%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ADSK
Why this score
- Durable high returns
MNDY
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
ADSKAutodesk, Inc.
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $53.6b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $329.09 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.96 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 34 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $314.19 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 46% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 187% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 37x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
MNDYmonday.com Ltd.
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $3.9b. Down 58% from 52-week high of $220.80 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +27% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.28 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 23 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $109.00 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong. Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
Down 58% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 39x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ADSK and MNDY diverge
On the headline score the gap is 8.7 points in favor of ADSK. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityADSK 87.9 · MNDY 46.4ADSK +41.5
- ValueADSK 73.4 · MNDY 92.6MNDY +19.2
- GrowthADSK 85.9 · MNDY 92.4MNDY +6.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.