Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MMYT scored 31.5, EAT scored 67.4 — EAT leads.
Compare another set
MMYT
MakeMyTrip Limited
Travel Services · Quality-Growth
31.5
$44.73 · $4.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
35.9
EAT leads
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
Restaurants · Quality-Growth
67.4
$193.87 · $8.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthEAT+7.9%
Highest qualityEAT81 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
MMYT
stronger →← stronger
EAT
59
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
81
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
73
11
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
52
EAT is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
MMYT
EAT
$153mC
FCF
$558mC+
+6.7%C+
Rev
+7.9%B
Negative equity
D/E
3.96D
4.0xC
P/S
—
5.39D
PEG
1.70C+
—
P/E
17.8xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
MMYT
EAT
57% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
3% above
~21%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~8%/yr
-44%
1-yr DCF upside
-10%
-36%
5-yr DCF upside
-3%
-23%
10-yr DCF upside
+8%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
MMYT
Why this score
Cyclical growth
EAT
Why this score
Buying back stock
Durable high returns
The companies
MMYTMakeMyTrip Limited
Travel Services · $44.73 · beta 1.06
Why now
Travel Services · market cap $4.2b. Down 54% from 52-week high of $96.60 — deep drawdown territory. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $73.80 (implying +65% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income.
Risk
Down 54% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.2% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
EATBrinker International, Inc.
Restaurants · $193.87 · beta 1.26
Why now
Restaurants · market cap $8.1b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $254.99 — deep drawdown territory. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $262.59 (implying +35% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 114% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
D/E 3.96 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where MMYT and EAT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 35.9 points in favor of EAT. The widest single difference is Value, where EAT leads by 41.2 points.
ValueMMYT 10.5 · EAT 51.7EAT +41.2
GrowthMMYT 50.0 · EAT 73.4EAT +23.4
QualityMMYT 59.5 · EAT 80.8EAT +21.3
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is EAT or MMYT the better stock?
EAT scores higher: EAT 67.4, MMYT 31.5 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do EAT and MMYT differ most?
The widest gap is value, where EAT leads by 41 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. EAT leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are EAT and MMYT scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.