Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MLI scored 77.1, SYM scored 53.6 — MLI leads.
Compare another set
MLI
Mueller Industries, Inc.
Metal Fabrication · Quality-Growth
77.1
$60.71 · $13.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
23.5
MLI leads
SYM
Symbotic Inc.
Specialty Industrial Machinery · Quality-Growth
53.6
$42.63 · $25.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthSYM+20.6%
Strongest balance sheetMLI0.01
Highest qualityMLI83 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
MLI
stronger →← stronger
SYM
83
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
41
84
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
90
66
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
42
MLI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
MLI
SYM
$666mC+
FCF
$847mC+
+14.8%B+
Rev
+20.6%A-
0.01A
D/E
0.02A
15.8xA-
P/E
—
3.41D
PEG
—
—
P/S
9.8xD
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
MLI
SYM
22% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
133% above
~13%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~37%/yr
-26%
1-yr DCF upside
-65%
-18%
5-yr DCF upside
-57%
-5%
10-yr DCF upside
-44%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
MLI
Why this score
Raising its dividend
Durable high returns
Diluting shareholders
SYM
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
The companies
MLIMueller Industries, Inc.
Metal Fabrication · $60.71 · beta 1.09
Why now
Metal Fabrication · market cap $13.4b. 15% off the 52-week high of $71.12. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median.
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 24% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $25.8b. Down 51% from 52-week high of $87.88 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +21%, comfortably above the S&P median. 14 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $62.86 (implying +47% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income.
Risk
Down 51% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.97 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Net margin 0.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where MLI and SYM diverge
On the headline score the gap is 23.5 points in favor of MLI. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
QualityMLI 82.8 · SYM 41.1MLI +41.7
ValueMLI 65.8 · SYM 41.6MLI +24.2
GrowthMLI 84.1 · SYM 90.2SYM +6.1
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is MLI or SYM the better stock?
MLI scores higher: MLI 77.1, SYM 53.6 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do MLI and SYM differ most?
The widest gap is quality, where MLI leads by 42 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are MLI and SYM scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.