COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
MLCO vs WEN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MLCO scored 66.2, WEN scored 37.2 — MLCO leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. WEN's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but MLCO's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
66.2
$5.49 · $2.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
29.0
MLCO leads
WEN
The Wendy's Company
37.2
$8.84 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestMLCO9.3x
- Fastest growthMLCO+11.3%
- Highest qualityWEN65 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueMLCO-93%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
MLCO
stronger →← stronger
WEN
64
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
65
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
13
91
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
62
MLCO is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
MLCO
WEN
$809mC+
FCF
$264mC
+11.3%B
Rev
-1.0%D+
9.3xA
P/E
13.6xA-
0.59A-
PEG
1.73C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
MLCO
WEN
93% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
59% below
decline
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-17%/yr
+919%
1-yr DCF upside
+135%
+1252%
5-yr DCF upside
+142%
+1978%
10-yr DCF upside
+152%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
MLCO
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cyclical growth
WEN
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
The companies
MLCOMelco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
Why now
Resorts & Casinos · market cap $2.1b. Down 46% from 52-week high of $10.15 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.59 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $7.35 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 46% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE -15% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
WENThe Wendy's Company
Why now
Restaurants · market cap $1.7b. 17% off the 52-week high of $10.62. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $7.79 (implying -12% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where MLCO and WEN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 29.0 points in favor of MLCO. The widest single difference is Growth, where MLCO leads by 37.0 points.
- GrowthMLCO 50.0 · WEN 13.0MLCO +37.0
- ValueMLCO 90.6 · WEN 61.5MLCO +29.1
- QualityMLCO 64.0 · WEN 64.6level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.