COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
MGM vs YUMC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MGM scored 58.0, YUMC scored 74.0 — YUMC leads.
Compare another set
MGM
MGM Resorts International
58
$43.69 · $11.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
16.0
YUMC leads
YUMC
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
74
$48.92 · $16.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestYUMC18.1x
- Fastest growthYUMC+8.8%
- Strongest balance sheetYUMC0.38
- Highest qualityYUMC84 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueMGM-47%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
MGM
stronger →← stronger
YUMC
60
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
84
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
75
65
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
64
YUMC is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
MGM
YUMC
$1.5bC+
FCF
$940mC+
+3.2%C+
Rev
+8.8%B
8.93D
D/E
0.38A-
26.5xC+
P/E
18.1xB
0.61A-
PEG
1.24B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
MGM
YUMC
47% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
5% below
~-9%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~8%/yr
+71%
1-yr DCF upside
-8%
+88%
5-yr DCF upside
+6%
+114%
10-yr DCF upside
+30%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
MGM
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cyclical growth
YUMC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
MGMMGM Resorts International
Why now
Resorts & Casinos · market cap $11.2b. 15% off the 52-week high of $51.59. PEG 0.61 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $50.63 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
D/E 8.93 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 2.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
YUMCYum China Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Restaurants · market cap $16.7b. 16% off the 52-week high of $58.39. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $62.05 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 96% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where MGM and YUMC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 16.0 points in favor of YUMC. The widest single difference is Growth, where YUMC leads by 25.4 points.
- GrowthMGM 50.0 · YUMC 75.4YUMC +25.4
- QualityMGM 60.4 · YUMC 83.9YUMC +23.5
- ValueMGM 64.8 · YUMC 64.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.