COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
MGM vs MLCO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MGM scored 58.0, MLCO scored 66.2 — MLCO leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. MGM's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but MLCO's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
MGM
MGM Resorts International
58
$43.69 · $11.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
8.2
MLCO leads
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
66.2
$5.49 · $2.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestMLCO9.3x
- Fastest growthMLCO+11.3%
- Highest qualityMLCO64 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueMLCO-93%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
MGM
stronger →← stronger
MLCO
60
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
64
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
65
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
91
MLCO is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
MGM
MLCO
$1.5bC+
FCF
$809mC+
+3.2%C+
Rev
+11.3%B
8.93D
D/E
—
26.5xC+
P/E
9.3xA
0.61A-
PEG
0.59A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
MGM
MLCO
47% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
93% below
~-9%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
decline
+71%
1-yr DCF upside
+919%
+88%
5-yr DCF upside
+1252%
+114%
10-yr DCF upside
+1978%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
MGM
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cyclical growth
MLCO
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cyclical growth
The companies
MGMMGM Resorts International
Why now
Resorts & Casinos · market cap $11.2b. 15% off the 52-week high of $51.59. PEG 0.61 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $50.63 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
D/E 8.93 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 2.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
MLCOMelco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
Why now
Resorts & Casinos · market cap $2.1b. Down 46% from 52-week high of $10.15 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.59 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $7.35 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 46% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE -15% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where MGM and MLCO diverge
On the headline score the gap is 8.2 points in favor of MLCO. The widest single difference is Value, where MLCO leads by 25.8 points.
- ValueMGM 64.8 · MLCO 90.6MLCO +25.8
- QualityMGM 60.4 · MLCO 64.0MLCO +3.6
- GrowthMGM 50.0 · MLCO 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.