COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

MGEE vs MWH

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MGEE scored 54.7, MWH scored 72.0 — MWH leads.
Compare another set
MGEE
MGE Energy, Inc.
Utilities - Regulated Electric · Quality-Growth
54.7
$78.66 · $3.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
17.3
MWH leads
MWH
SOLV Energy, Inc.
Utilities - Renewable · Quality-Growth
72
$28.34 · $5.7B
fundamentals as of
  • Fastest growthMWH+34.8%
  • Strongest balance sheetMWH0.10
  • Highest qualityMWH75 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueMWH-34%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD54.7/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY55.9GROWTH65.3VALUE44.7
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD72.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY74.9GROWTH95.2VALUE86.5
MGEEMWHQuality55.974.9Growth65.395.2Value44.786.5
FCFMGEE-$131mMWH$368m
RevMGEE+9.9%MWH+34.8%
D/EMGEE0.65MWH0.10
PEGMGEE4.12MWH1.17
MGEE
stronger →← stronger
MWH
56
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
75
65
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
95
45
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
87
MWH is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
MGEE
MWH
-$131mF
FCF
$368mC
+9.9%B
Rev
+34.8%A
0.65A
D/E
0.10A
3.9xC
P/S
4.12D
PEG
1.17B+
P/E
48.0xD
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
MGEE
MWH
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
34% below
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~4%/yr
1-yr DCF upside
+15%
5-yr DCF upside
+51%
10-yr DCF upside
+125%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
MGEE
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
MWH
Why this score
  • Short track record
MGEEMGE Energy, Inc.
Utilities - Regulated Electric · $78.66 · beta 0.70
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $3.0b. 11% off the 52-week high of $88.01. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $78.25 (implying -1% upside).
Moat
Net margin 20% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$131m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk.
MWHSOLV Energy, Inc.
Utilities - Renewable · $28.34
Why now
Utilities - Renewable · market cap $5.7b. Down 41% from 52-week high of $48.40 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +35% — in hypergrowth territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $45.18 (implying +59% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 41% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 48x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Net margin 3.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where MGEE and MWH diverge

On the headline score the gap is 17.3 points in favor of MWH. The widest single difference is Value, where MWH leads by 41.8 points.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.