COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CIG vs MGEE
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CIG scored 83.0, MGEE scored 54.7 — CIG leads.
Compare another set
CIG
Comp En De Mn Cemig
83
$1.92
Score gap
28.3
CIG leads
MGEE
MGE Energy, Inc.
54.7
$78.66 · $3.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthMGEE+9.9%
- Strongest balance sheetMGEE0.65
- Highest qualityMGEE56 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CIG
MGEE
$354mC
FCF
-$131mF
+8.1%B
Rev
+9.9%B
0.78A
D/E
0.65A
6.2xA
P/E
—
0.33A
PEG
4.12D
—
P/S
3.9xC
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
CIG
No notable signals flagged.
MGEE
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
CIGComp En De Mn Cemig
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap n/a. Down 30% from 52-week high of $2.76 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.33 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $2.14 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 80% of earnings on a 9.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
MGEEMGE Energy, Inc.
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $3.0b. 11% off the 52-week high of $88.01. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $78.25 (implying -1% upside).
Moat
Net margin 20% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$131m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.