COMPARE · Reviewed July 11, 2026
MELI vs YUMC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MELI scored 79.0, YUMC scored 76.2 — MELI leads.
Compare another set
MELI
MercadoLibre, Inc.
79
$1,852.22 · $93.9B
Score gap
2.8
MELI leads
YUMC
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
76.2
$43.02 · $14.8B
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
MELI
stronger →← stronger
YUMC
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
83
100
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
73
64
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
73
YUMC is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
MELI
YUMC
$11.8bA-
FCF
$931mC+
+36.4%A
Rev
+6.7%C+
1.70C+
D/E
0.38A-
48.8xC
P/E
16.5xB+
1.12B+
PEG
1.07B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
MELI
YUMC
57% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
12% below
~-6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
+77%
1-yr DCF upside
+1%
+131%
5-yr DCF upside
+14%
+237%
10-yr DCF upside
+35%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
MELI
Why this score
- Durable high returns
YUMC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
MELIMercadoLibre, Inc.
Why now
Internet Retail · market cap $93.9b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $2548.50 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +36% — in hypergrowth territory. 24 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $2,209 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong. $93.9b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Trailing P/E 49x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. E-commerce competition — Amazon, Walmart, Shein, and Temu have each forced the rest of the category to compete on price, fulfillment speed, or assortment; sustaining margins requires one of those being structurally defended.
YUMCYum China Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Restaurants · market cap $14.8b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $58.39 — deep drawdown territory. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $61.34 (implying +43% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.