COMPARE · Data as of August 14, 2026
MDA vs TXT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MDA scored 49.3, TXT scored 70.1 — TXT leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. TXT's fundamentals are as of July 2026, but MDA's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
MDA
MDA Space Ltd.
49.3
$35.21 · $5.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
20.8
TXT leads
TXT
Textron Inc.
70.1
$89.00 · $15.3B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
MDA
stronger →← stronger
TXT
23
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
64
98
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
75
63
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
71
TXT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
MDA
TXT
-$72mF
FCF
$759mC+
+51.2%A
Rev
+8.8%B
—
D/E
0.52B
3.8xC+
P/S
—
0.87B+
PEG
1.19B+
—
P/E
16.8xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
MDA
TXT
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
4% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~9%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-14%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-4%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+14%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
MDA
Why this score
- Short track record
- Foreign reporter (CAD)
TXT
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Short track record
The companies
MDAMDA Space Ltd.
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $5.7b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $49.37 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +51% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.87 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $44.29 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$72m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 61.8x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Net margin 2.2% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
TXTTextron Inc.
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $15.3b. 12% off the 52-week high of $101.57. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $101.89 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where MDA and TXT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 20.8 points in favor of TXT. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityMDA 22.6 · TXT 64.4TXT +41.8
- GrowthMDA 97.8 · TXT 75.1MDA +22.7
- ValueMDA 63.3 · TXT 71.4TXT +8.1
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.