COMPARE · Data as of August 14, 2026
MDA vs OMAB
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MDA scored 49.3, OMAB scored 66.2 — OMAB leads.
Compare another set
MDA
MDA Space Ltd.
49.3
$35.21 · $5.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
16.9
OMAB leads
OMAB
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.
66.2
$103.39 · $5.0B
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
MDA
stronger →← stronger
OMAB
23
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
90
98
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
63
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
89
OMAB is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
MDA
OMAB
-$72mF
FCF
$399mC
+51.2%A
Rev
+4.3%C+
—
D/E
1.54C
3.8xC+
P/S
—
0.87B+
PEG
0.76A-
—
P/E
15.7xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
MDA
OMAB
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
41% below
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-1%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
+37%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+69%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+129%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
MDA
Why this score
- Short track record
- Foreign reporter (CAD)
OMAB
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
- Foreign reporter (MXN)
The companies
MDAMDA Space Ltd.
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $5.7b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $49.37 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +51% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.87 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $44.29 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$72m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 61.8x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Net margin 2.2% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
OMABGrupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.
Why now
Airports & Air Services · market cap $5.0b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $134.99 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.76 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $123.90 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 33% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 47% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 125% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Dividend payout 85% of earnings on a 5.3% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where MDA and OMAB diverge
On the headline score the gap is 16.9 points in favor of OMAB. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityMDA 22.6 · OMAB 89.7OMAB +67.1
- GrowthMDA 97.8 · OMAB 50.0MDA +47.8
- ValueMDA 63.3 · OMAB 88.9OMAB +25.6
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.