COMPARE · Data as of August 14, 2026
LMT vs MDA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LMT scored 66.1, MDA scored 49.3 — LMT leads.
Compare another set
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
66.1
$608.68 · $140.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
16.8
LMT leads
MDA
MDA Space Ltd.
49.3
$35.21 · $5.7B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
LMT
stronger →← stronger
MDA
80
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
23
67
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
98
54
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
63
MDA is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
LMT
MDA
$8.7bB+
FCF
-$72mF
+7.2%B
Rev
+51.2%A
2.34D
D/E
—
22.4xB+
P/E
—
1.26B
PEG
0.87B+
—
P/S
3.8xC+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
LMT
MDA
1% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-5%
1-yr DCF upside
—
+1%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+9%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
LMT
Why this score
- Durable high returns
MDA
Why this score
- Short track record
- Foreign reporter (CAD)
The companies
LMTLockheed Martin Corporation
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $140.5b. 12% off the 52-week high of $692.00. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $632.95 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
ROE 72% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 139% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $140.5b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
D/E 2.34 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
MDAMDA Space Ltd.
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $5.7b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $49.37 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +51% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.87 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $44.29 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$72m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 61.8x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Net margin 2.2% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where LMT and MDA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 16.8 points in favor of LMT. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityLMT 80.4 · MDA 22.6LMT +57.8
- GrowthLMT 67.0 · MDA 97.8MDA +30.8
- ValueLMT 53.6 · MDA 63.3MDA +9.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.