COMPARE · Data as of October 9, 2026

MCO vs CBOE

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MCO scored 76.0, CBOE scored 81.0 — CBOE leads.
Compare another set
MCO
Moody's Corporation
Financial Data & Stock Exchanges · Financial strength
58.9Fin
$464.23 · $80.4B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
0.8
MCO leads
CBOE
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
Financial Data & Stock Exchanges · Financial strength
58.1Fin
$304.16 · $31.8B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestCBOE23.7x
  • Fastest growthCBOE+15.1%
  • Strongest balance sheetCBOE0.28
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD58.9/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANFINANCIAL58.9
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD58.1/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANFINANCIAL58.1
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)2%25%19x34xMCOCBOE

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFMCO$3.0bCBOE$1.9b
RevMCO+11.7%CBOE+15.1%
D/EMCO2.41CBOE0.28
P/EMCO29.5xCBOE23.7x
PEGMCO1.60CBOE2.60
MCO
CBOE
$3.0bB
FCF
$1.9bC+
+11.7%B
Rev
+15.1%B+
2.41C
D/E
0.28B+
29.5xD
P/E
23.7xC
1.60C+
PEG
2.60C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
MCOMoody's Corporation
Financial Data & Stock Exchanges · $464.23 · beta 1.35
Why now
Financial Data & Stock Exchanges · market cap $80.4b. 15% off the 52-week high of $546.88. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $560.38 (implying +21% upside).
Moat
Net margin 34% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 92% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 106% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
D/E 2.41 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc.
Financial Data & Stock Exchanges · $304.16 · beta 0.41
Why now
Financial Data & Stock Exchanges · market cap $31.8b. 18% off the 52-week high of $371.18. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $320.47 (implying +5% upside).
Moat
Net margin 27% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 139% of net income, helped by cash released from working capital ($446m) that doesn't repeat every year.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Common questions

Is CBOE or MCO the better stock?

CBOE scores higher: CBOE 81.0, MCO 76.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

How are CBOE and MCO scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.