COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
MBC vs ONON
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MBC scored 24.9, ONON scored 75.4 — ONON leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. MBC's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but ONON's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
MBC
MasterBrand, Inc.
24.9
$8.66 · $1.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
50.5
ONON leads
ONON
On Holding AG
75.4
$29.23 · $9.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthONON+30.0%
- Strongest balance sheetONON0.29
- Highest qualityONON71 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
MBC
stronger →← stronger
ONON
26
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
71
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
96
41
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
73
ONON is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
MBC
ONON
$74mC-
FCF
$393mC
-0.0%D+
Rev
+30.0%A
0.86B
D/E
0.29A-
0.6xA-
P/S
—
—
PEG
0.57A-
—
P/E
19.6xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
MBC
ONON
37% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
108% above
~23%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~33%/yr
-44%
1-yr DCF upside
-60%
-27%
5-yr DCF upside
-52%
+6%
10-yr DCF upside
-38%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
MBC
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
ONON
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Diluting shareholders
- Foreign reporter (CHF)
The companies
MBCMasterBrand, Inc.
Why now
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances · market cap $1.8b. Down 39% from 52-week high of $14.22 — deep drawdown territory. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $10.36 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -3.5%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 39% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.44 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
ONONOn Holding AG
Why now
Footwear & Accessories · market cap $9.8b. Down 43% from 52-week high of $51.08 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +30% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.57 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 27 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $45.15 (implying +54% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Down 43% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.12 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where MBC and ONON diverge
On the headline score the gap is 50.5 points in favor of ONON. The widest single difference is Growth, where ONON leads by 81.5 points.
- GrowthMBC 14.3 · ONON 95.8ONON +81.5
- QualityMBC 26.4 · ONON 71.0ONON +44.6
- ValueMBC 40.8 · ONON 73.4ONON +32.6
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.